Republicans what the hell is this NEW WORLD ORDER you keep ranting about?

Serious question what the hell are you talking about and what does a new WORLD order have to do with the president and this country


EXPLAIN





DETAILS


AND FACTS I CAN CHECK!!!!!!!WHAT IS A WORLD ORDER???Republicans what the hell is this NEW WORLD ORDER you keep ranting about?
This is simply the latest ';catch phrase'; Lardass Limbaugh implanted in the Shittoheads empty little minds. Actually George Herbert Walker Bush first brought up the ';New World Order'; in a speech while he was in office.





Another interesting read is if you Google PNAC, will leave you speecless, and note the names involved.Republicans what the hell is this NEW WORLD ORDER you keep ranting about?
The new world order Idea is to create a global system of financial control, run by the government and elite. It will govern political system is all countries and control all their banks.





The Global new deal, what we've been told about it so far is it's to 'save' the world's economy by forming an alliance with very country in the world. The government %26amp; elite will control it





Difference? None.


FYI, I am not even republican.





Also Obama does support it because he is a member of the CFR, you will find a video on his own website at a speech at the Chicago CFR meeting saying the world needs no borders %26amp; boundaries.


He made a speech in berlin about it, and he wrote about it in his book.


It's the whole government who are in on it.


You will also find Gordon Brown proposing the Global new deal to American congress on most news sites.





EDIT: And alllso lol, might be abit too much for you but religiously speaking a one world government is signifies the Anti christs arrival.





http://www.freewebs.com/misterknow/GB%20…


Mad man gordon brown when he tried to convinced everyone in England to do it for climate change.... now it's for the economic crisis. Coincidence? No because it was completely planned.





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uv5cqh26C…


Gordon Brown's speech on it





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJv6Vr00q…


Obama's call for globalization
George Bush Sr.was the first to use the term 'new world order' when giving speeches. He stated something to the affect that it would entail a world of laws amongst nations that would bring about a more peaceful co-existence among nations of the world via the United Nations.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CWBTL33M…


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7a9Syi12R…





Here is JFK's speech on secrecy and information kept from the public by the media where he requests journalists/media to provide and inform the public of truth regardless of what it is.


I just found it a really good speech.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhZk8ronc…





There are many theories about what a 'new world order' is about. My suggestion would be to google and read different articles to form your own opinion.





Add: Gordon Brown was here to visit President Obama and also spoke to the joint congress. He is trying to get the US to go along with the ';Global New Deal'; and is hoping that the US will speak to it or join in to talks about it at the G20 summit coming up soon.





';Brown will meet Obama on Tuesday and address a joint session of Congress on Wednesday. Aides say he has both to demonstrate to a sceptical British public that he commands the respect of the president, and to persuade the American political establishment that global action is needed to rescue the US economy.


Brown is under pressure to persuade American political leaders to sign up to bold aims for the G20 summit of industrial and leading developing nations, which is to be held in London next month.


Many US politicians believe economic policy should put America first, and have shown little interest in concerted global action. Brown will argue for a renewal of the transatlantic relationship, with the two powers working together to solve global economic problems.


The prime minister will borrow from the rhetoric of Franklin Roosevelt, who introduced the government-financed New Deal to tackle the US Depression of the 1930s. He will argue that his 21st century “global new deal” will also require public spending on a huge world-wide scale.';


Writing in The Sunday Times today, Brown calls for “universal action to prevent the crisis spreading, to stimulate the global economy and to help reduce the severity and length of the global recession.


His stress on continued economic “stimulation” will increase speculation about next month’s budget. No 10 sources said that, while no final decision had been taken about further tax cuts, the prime minister would do “whatever it took” to pull the UK out of recession.';


http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk…





Britain may be one of our greatest allies, but it sounds to me like Mr. Brown is in a bit of a pickle of his own in the UK.


This sounds to me more along the lines of countries governments investing heavily in other countries. Most countries, but especially Britain, that had insurance companies, or investors that purchased the blocks of bad mortgage funds are hurting in a big way. Britain is in recession, and they were also the most heavily invested via finance firms and insurance companies.





The New World Order basically speaks to one world government, one world currency, a small group of leaders ruling everyone on the planet and deciding how each country will operate etc.


To hear Bush Sr. speak of it in the clips above, it sounds along the lines of world laws that will bring about world peace in some fashion under the guidance of the UN as the peace keepers.





What Mr. Brown seems to be speaking to is rescuing his own country, along with the others from the G20 that are putting the pressure on, under the guise of rescuing the United States from its economic woes.


Several of the Global banks already infused large amounts of capital into banks, finance firms, and lending/credit firms, when it started going down late last fall.


I don't know how much more other countries are going to want to invest, unless they invest in short term Treasury bills. Foreign investors/country's invest into our Treasury bills more than US investors do. The fed could print out more and sell off as short term to create an influx before inflation caused interest rates to start climbing. Those would have some yield to them, since deflation is currently the problem at hand and not inflation.


Most country's are into our Treasury bills for long term maturity and would get nothing back if they sold them, so they might want to invest in the short term bills as a way to infuse more capital into our market, and enable themselves to get a short term payback.


I am not one to think that we will join in huge investing into other countries until our own economic problems are solved.


I think that we will hear more about short term Treasury bills being offered in the weeks to come. I don't think that we are going to join into that ';global new deal'; but perhaps might be able to find a way to help Britain.


I could be wrong, but I just don't see it happening, not at this moment in time.





An older Independent
One World Government.





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rc7i0wCFf…
It's a plan to overthrow--inevitably--the worst President in American History.
Read the Bible..it is all in there..is coming sooner than you think..look at what is happening in this country and in this world..
Typical demmy looking for a handout. Google it.
George Bush the first invented it.
Read the drudgereport.com
Geraldine is right on
Geraldine, Rooker and Alpha Tarheel are completely right.


Research about it and it will set you free
just do a search for Alex Jones
PROJECT FOR THE NEW AMERICAN CENTURY


The PNAC was co-founded by William Kristol and Robert Kagan in 1997, with roots in the 1992 Pentagon. PNAC's original 25 signatories were an eclectic mix of academics and conservative politicians, several of whom have subsequently found positions in the presidential administration of George Walker Bush. PNAC is noteworthy for its focus on Iraq, a preoccupation that began before Bush became president and predates the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. In 1998, the group wrote a letter to President Bill Clinton, Mississippi Senator Trent Lott (then Senate Majority Leader) and Newt Gingrich (then Speaker of the House of Representatives), demanding a harder line against Iraq. By then, the group had grown in numbers, adding individuals such as former Reagan-era U.N. Ambassador Jeane J. Kirkpatrick, and long-time Washington cold warrior/pro-LikudRichard N. Perle.





According to William Rivers Pitt, ';Two events brought PNAC into the mainstream of American government: the disputed election of George W. Bush and the attacks of September 11th. When Bush assumed the Presidency, the men who created and nurtured the imperial dreams of PNAC became the men who run the Pentagon, the Defense Department and the White House. When the Towers came down, these men saw, at long last, their chance to turn their White Papers into substantive policy.';[1]





Several original PNAC members, including Cheney, Khalilzad and the Bush family, have ties to the oil industry. Many other members have been long-time fixtures in the U.S. military establishment or Cold War ';strategic studies,'; including Elliott Abrams, Dick Cheney, Paula Dobriansky, Aaron Friedberg, Frank Gaffney, Fred C. Ikle, Peter W. Rodman, Stephen P. Rosen, Henry S. Rowen, Donald H. Rumsfeld, John R. Bolton, Vin Weber, and Paul Dundes Wolfowitz. It should not be surprising, therefore, that while the group devotes inordinate attention to Iraq, its most general focus has been on a need to ';re-arm America.'; The prospect of mining oil riches may explain part of the group's focus on Iraq, but this motivation has been buried under the rhetoric of national security and the need for strong national defense.





To justify a need to ';rearm'; the country, however, reasons must be found. In the more peaceable world of the late 1990s, with no rival super-power in sight, Iraq and ';ballistic missile defense'; against ';rogue states'; were the main games in town. The group's links to advocacy for ballistic missile defense came through Donald Rumsfeld, who in 1998 chaired a bi-partisan commission on the ';US Ballistic Missile Threat'; and Vin Weber, a registered lobbyist for Lockheed Martin and other Fortune 500 companies.





According to a February 27, 2003, editorial by William Rivers Pitt, PNAC





has been agitating since its inception for a war with Iraq. PNAC was the driving force behind the drafting and passage of the Iraqi Liberation Act, a bill that painted a veneer of legality over the ultimate designs behind such a conflict. The names of every prominent PNAC member were on a letter delivered to President Clinton in 1998 which castigated him for not implementing the Act by driving troops into Baghdad.


PNAC has funneled millions of taxpayer dollars to a Hussein opposition group called the Iraqi National Congress, and to Iraq's heir-apparent, Ahmed Chalabi, despite the fact that Chalabi was sentenced in absentia by a Jordanian court to 22 years in prison on 31 counts of bank fraud. Chalabi and the INC have, over the years, gathered support for their cause by promising oil contracts to anyone that would help to put them in power in Iraq.


Most recently, PNAC created a new group called the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq. Staffed entirely by PNAC members, The Committee has set out to ';educate'; Americans via cable news connections about the need for war in Iraq. This group met recently with National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice regarding the ways and means of this education. ...


The Project for the New American Century seeks to establish what they call 'Pax Americana' across the globe. Essentially, their goal is to transform America, the sole remaining superpower, into a planetary empire by force of arms. A report released by PNAC in September of 2000 entitled 'Rebuilding America's Defenses' codifies this plan, which requires a massive increase in defense spending and the fighting of several major theater wars in order to establish American dominance. The first has been achieved in Bush's new budget plan, which calls for the exact dollar amount to be spent on defense that was requested by PNAC in 2000. Arrangements are underway for the fighting of the wars.
The republicans know it as PNAC (******* for a New American Century).





G.H.W Bush called it a ';New World Order.';





It is the republican wet dream of outsourcing all labor overseas, and letting the money roll in to the USA.





Only trouble is, once the goods and means of production have flown the coop, the greenbacks failed to return to the roost.
well is a extreme neoconservative agenda the republicans try to used to blame the democrats in poor words is their shjjt and now they go around to say come from us...





and 9/11 is one of many even of their agenda








do your homework about Paul Wolfowitz is who write down


the nazi oopss sorry I mean the Necon Agenda
This will happen anyway. Probably not with Obama but it will happen eventually.





Don't know why Republicans try to stop the inevitable.
In the internet language it just means that more people from foreign nations will come to our site and tell us how to run our country third world style. I'd watch out for those zany Arabs they like to dress up as crazy cats.
the most scandalous issue about it was assassinating anyone who opposes even if its the Pope.
Its a conspiracy theory that's believed in mostly by isolated, unstable Unabomber types.
I think they've been watching too many wrestling tv.