Serious question what the hell are you talking about and what does a new WORLD order have to do with the president and this country
EXPLAIN
DETAILS
AND FACTS I CAN CHECK!!!!!!!WHAT IS A WORLD ORDER???Republicans what the hell is this NEW WORLD ORDER you keep ranting about?
This is simply the latest ';catch phrase'; Lardass Limbaugh implanted in the Shittoheads empty little minds. Actually George Herbert Walker Bush first brought up the ';New World Order'; in a speech while he was in office.
Another interesting read is if you Google PNAC, will leave you speecless, and note the names involved.Republicans what the hell is this NEW WORLD ORDER you keep ranting about?
The new world order Idea is to create a global system of financial control, run by the government and elite. It will govern political system is all countries and control all their banks.
The Global new deal, what we've been told about it so far is it's to 'save' the world's economy by forming an alliance with very country in the world. The government %26amp; elite will control it
Difference? None.
FYI, I am not even republican.
Also Obama does support it because he is a member of the CFR, you will find a video on his own website at a speech at the Chicago CFR meeting saying the world needs no borders %26amp; boundaries.
He made a speech in berlin about it, and he wrote about it in his book.
It's the whole government who are in on it.
You will also find Gordon Brown proposing the Global new deal to American congress on most news sites.
EDIT: And alllso lol, might be abit too much for you but religiously speaking a one world government is signifies the Anti christs arrival.
http://www.freewebs.com/misterknow/GB%20…
Mad man gordon brown when he tried to convinced everyone in England to do it for climate change.... now it's for the economic crisis. Coincidence? No because it was completely planned.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uv5cqh26C…
Gordon Brown's speech on it
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJv6Vr00q…
Obama's call for globalization
George Bush Sr.was the first to use the term 'new world order' when giving speeches. He stated something to the affect that it would entail a world of laws amongst nations that would bring about a more peaceful co-existence among nations of the world via the United Nations.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CWBTL33M…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7a9Syi12R…
Here is JFK's speech on secrecy and information kept from the public by the media where he requests journalists/media to provide and inform the public of truth regardless of what it is.
I just found it a really good speech.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhZk8ronc…
There are many theories about what a 'new world order' is about. My suggestion would be to google and read different articles to form your own opinion.
Add: Gordon Brown was here to visit President Obama and also spoke to the joint congress. He is trying to get the US to go along with the ';Global New Deal'; and is hoping that the US will speak to it or join in to talks about it at the G20 summit coming up soon.
';Brown will meet Obama on Tuesday and address a joint session of Congress on Wednesday. Aides say he has both to demonstrate to a sceptical British public that he commands the respect of the president, and to persuade the American political establishment that global action is needed to rescue the US economy.
Brown is under pressure to persuade American political leaders to sign up to bold aims for the G20 summit of industrial and leading developing nations, which is to be held in London next month.
Many US politicians believe economic policy should put America first, and have shown little interest in concerted global action. Brown will argue for a renewal of the transatlantic relationship, with the two powers working together to solve global economic problems.
The prime minister will borrow from the rhetoric of Franklin Roosevelt, who introduced the government-financed New Deal to tackle the US Depression of the 1930s. He will argue that his 21st century “global new deal” will also require public spending on a huge world-wide scale.';
Writing in The Sunday Times today, Brown calls for “universal action to prevent the crisis spreading, to stimulate the global economy and to help reduce the severity and length of the global recession.
His stress on continued economic “stimulation” will increase speculation about next month’s budget. No 10 sources said that, while no final decision had been taken about further tax cuts, the prime minister would do “whatever it took” to pull the UK out of recession.';
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk…
Britain may be one of our greatest allies, but it sounds to me like Mr. Brown is in a bit of a pickle of his own in the UK.
This sounds to me more along the lines of countries governments investing heavily in other countries. Most countries, but especially Britain, that had insurance companies, or investors that purchased the blocks of bad mortgage funds are hurting in a big way. Britain is in recession, and they were also the most heavily invested via finance firms and insurance companies.
The New World Order basically speaks to one world government, one world currency, a small group of leaders ruling everyone on the planet and deciding how each country will operate etc.
To hear Bush Sr. speak of it in the clips above, it sounds along the lines of world laws that will bring about world peace in some fashion under the guidance of the UN as the peace keepers.
What Mr. Brown seems to be speaking to is rescuing his own country, along with the others from the G20 that are putting the pressure on, under the guise of rescuing the United States from its economic woes.
Several of the Global banks already infused large amounts of capital into banks, finance firms, and lending/credit firms, when it started going down late last fall.
I don't know how much more other countries are going to want to invest, unless they invest in short term Treasury bills. Foreign investors/country's invest into our Treasury bills more than US investors do. The fed could print out more and sell off as short term to create an influx before inflation caused interest rates to start climbing. Those would have some yield to them, since deflation is currently the problem at hand and not inflation.
Most country's are into our Treasury bills for long term maturity and would get nothing back if they sold them, so they might want to invest in the short term bills as a way to infuse more capital into our market, and enable themselves to get a short term payback.
I am not one to think that we will join in huge investing into other countries until our own economic problems are solved.
I think that we will hear more about short term Treasury bills being offered in the weeks to come. I don't think that we are going to join into that ';global new deal'; but perhaps might be able to find a way to help Britain.
I could be wrong, but I just don't see it happening, not at this moment in time.
An older Independent
One World Government.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rc7i0wCFf…
It's a plan to overthrow--inevitably--the worst President in American History.
Read the Bible..it is all in there..is coming sooner than you think..look at what is happening in this country and in this world..
Typical demmy looking for a handout. Google it.
George Bush the first invented it.
Read the drudgereport.com
Geraldine is right on
Geraldine, Rooker and Alpha Tarheel are completely right.
Research about it and it will set you free
just do a search for Alex Jones
PROJECT FOR THE NEW AMERICAN CENTURY
The PNAC was co-founded by William Kristol and Robert Kagan in 1997, with roots in the 1992 Pentagon. PNAC's original 25 signatories were an eclectic mix of academics and conservative politicians, several of whom have subsequently found positions in the presidential administration of George Walker Bush. PNAC is noteworthy for its focus on Iraq, a preoccupation that began before Bush became president and predates the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. In 1998, the group wrote a letter to President Bill Clinton, Mississippi Senator Trent Lott (then Senate Majority Leader) and Newt Gingrich (then Speaker of the House of Representatives), demanding a harder line against Iraq. By then, the group had grown in numbers, adding individuals such as former Reagan-era U.N. Ambassador Jeane J. Kirkpatrick, and long-time Washington cold warrior/pro-LikudRichard N. Perle.
According to William Rivers Pitt, ';Two events brought PNAC into the mainstream of American government: the disputed election of George W. Bush and the attacks of September 11th. When Bush assumed the Presidency, the men who created and nurtured the imperial dreams of PNAC became the men who run the Pentagon, the Defense Department and the White House. When the Towers came down, these men saw, at long last, their chance to turn their White Papers into substantive policy.';[1]
Several original PNAC members, including Cheney, Khalilzad and the Bush family, have ties to the oil industry. Many other members have been long-time fixtures in the U.S. military establishment or Cold War ';strategic studies,'; including Elliott Abrams, Dick Cheney, Paula Dobriansky, Aaron Friedberg, Frank Gaffney, Fred C. Ikle, Peter W. Rodman, Stephen P. Rosen, Henry S. Rowen, Donald H. Rumsfeld, John R. Bolton, Vin Weber, and Paul Dundes Wolfowitz. It should not be surprising, therefore, that while the group devotes inordinate attention to Iraq, its most general focus has been on a need to ';re-arm America.'; The prospect of mining oil riches may explain part of the group's focus on Iraq, but this motivation has been buried under the rhetoric of national security and the need for strong national defense.
To justify a need to ';rearm'; the country, however, reasons must be found. In the more peaceable world of the late 1990s, with no rival super-power in sight, Iraq and ';ballistic missile defense'; against ';rogue states'; were the main games in town. The group's links to advocacy for ballistic missile defense came through Donald Rumsfeld, who in 1998 chaired a bi-partisan commission on the ';US Ballistic Missile Threat'; and Vin Weber, a registered lobbyist for Lockheed Martin and other Fortune 500 companies.
According to a February 27, 2003, editorial by William Rivers Pitt, PNAC
has been agitating since its inception for a war with Iraq. PNAC was the driving force behind the drafting and passage of the Iraqi Liberation Act, a bill that painted a veneer of legality over the ultimate designs behind such a conflict. The names of every prominent PNAC member were on a letter delivered to President Clinton in 1998 which castigated him for not implementing the Act by driving troops into Baghdad.
PNAC has funneled millions of taxpayer dollars to a Hussein opposition group called the Iraqi National Congress, and to Iraq's heir-apparent, Ahmed Chalabi, despite the fact that Chalabi was sentenced in absentia by a Jordanian court to 22 years in prison on 31 counts of bank fraud. Chalabi and the INC have, over the years, gathered support for their cause by promising oil contracts to anyone that would help to put them in power in Iraq.
Most recently, PNAC created a new group called the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq. Staffed entirely by PNAC members, The Committee has set out to ';educate'; Americans via cable news connections about the need for war in Iraq. This group met recently with National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice regarding the ways and means of this education. ...
The Project for the New American Century seeks to establish what they call 'Pax Americana' across the globe. Essentially, their goal is to transform America, the sole remaining superpower, into a planetary empire by force of arms. A report released by PNAC in September of 2000 entitled 'Rebuilding America's Defenses' codifies this plan, which requires a massive increase in defense spending and the fighting of several major theater wars in order to establish American dominance. The first has been achieved in Bush's new budget plan, which calls for the exact dollar amount to be spent on defense that was requested by PNAC in 2000. Arrangements are underway for the fighting of the wars.
The republicans know it as PNAC (******* for a New American Century).
G.H.W Bush called it a ';New World Order.';
It is the republican wet dream of outsourcing all labor overseas, and letting the money roll in to the USA.
Only trouble is, once the goods and means of production have flown the coop, the greenbacks failed to return to the roost.
well is a extreme neoconservative agenda the republicans try to used to blame the democrats in poor words is their shjjt and now they go around to say come from us...
and 9/11 is one of many even of their agenda
do your homework about Paul Wolfowitz is who write down
the nazi oopss sorry I mean the Necon Agenda
This will happen anyway. Probably not with Obama but it will happen eventually.
Don't know why Republicans try to stop the inevitable.
In the internet language it just means that more people from foreign nations will come to our site and tell us how to run our country third world style. I'd watch out for those zany Arabs they like to dress up as crazy cats.
the most scandalous issue about it was assassinating anyone who opposes even if its the Pope.
Its a conspiracy theory that's believed in mostly by isolated, unstable Unabomber types.
I think they've been watching too many wrestling tv.
Saturday, January 9, 2010
Should Serena Williams be banned from the US Open for her racist rant?
Back up it goes!
I think she should be banned for at least one more year. Now she's trying to back track and say she wants to give the line ref a hug. Barf! hack choke! She makes me sick. I hate her attitude. Someone needs to just give her a beat down once or twice for a reality check. But then so does a lot of other ';stars'; like Kanye West...
2009-09-14 17:03:58Additional
As a reminder she said, ';I would kill you, you fat ugly ****!'; among other things. I guess people don't care much about sportsmanship anymore. Remember when Monica Seles was banned from Wimbledon just for not showing up because she was in the hospital and didn't notify them?Should Serena Williams be banned from the US Open for her racist rant?
i think so too, she has proved that she's a unique case of arrogance and shamed the image of tennis and women, she's got to learn her lesson by being banned!!!
hopes she learns fast..beach makeup almay
I think she should be banned for at least one more year. Now she's trying to back track and say she wants to give the line ref a hug. Barf! hack choke! She makes me sick. I hate her attitude. Someone needs to just give her a beat down once or twice for a reality check. But then so does a lot of other ';stars'; like Kanye West...
2009-09-14 17:03:58Additional
As a reminder she said, ';I would kill you, you fat ugly ****!'; among other things. I guess people don't care much about sportsmanship anymore. Remember when Monica Seles was banned from Wimbledon just for not showing up because she was in the hospital and didn't notify them?Should Serena Williams be banned from the US Open for her racist rant?
i think so too, she has proved that she's a unique case of arrogance and shamed the image of tennis and women, she's got to learn her lesson by being banned!!!
hopes she learns fast..
Aren't most of the Q&A in the Politics section a ';rant';?
Do you think Q%26amp;A in the Politics section of Y!A should be so easily removed for being a rant or similar reasons? I have noticed that some posters flag Q%26amp;A just because they don't personally agree with the political tone. You can of course just appeal and have the post restored thus doing damage to the offending reporter's credibility rating. But it takes time when this happens, and I think a lot of people just let it go which means the malicious reporter ends up getting away with it.
Couldn't most of the Q%26amp;A in this section be considered a rant when it is really just opposing viewpoint? This is, after all, politics! Given, there are certain posts that do drone on without providing a question or answer, but since politics naturally lean more towards opinions, do you think it should be a little more difficult for a question to be removed for a reason such as ';rant'; in this section?Aren't most of the Q%26amp;A in the Politics section a ';rant';?
An opinion I would say. I have never reported anyone. But I have been reported. It does bother me a little that instead of just answering they feel the need to report. I find it informative and what the heck you can say how you feel w/o getting into an argument face to face.Aren't most of the Q%26amp;A in the Politics section a ';rant';?
I got a degree in political science. I really enjoy what other people have to say! I have been reported as well and I can say that my question was not harmful to anyone!
I like people to keep an open mind about questions I ask but many times as you say they just rant and rave not really having a opinion and so many of the answers are biased!
Sometimes, people who hold a particular political view ask questions not seeking information but to receive reinforcement from like minded individuals. The more certain they are that the vast majority agrees with them, the more likely they are to report people who do not agree.
Try not to take it personally. Here is a star to help you feel better.
*
Couldn't most of the Q%26amp;A in this section be considered a rant when it is really just opposing viewpoint? This is, after all, politics! Given, there are certain posts that do drone on without providing a question or answer, but since politics naturally lean more towards opinions, do you think it should be a little more difficult for a question to be removed for a reason such as ';rant'; in this section?Aren't most of the Q%26amp;A in the Politics section a ';rant';?
An opinion I would say. I have never reported anyone. But I have been reported. It does bother me a little that instead of just answering they feel the need to report. I find it informative and what the heck you can say how you feel w/o getting into an argument face to face.Aren't most of the Q%26amp;A in the Politics section a ';rant';?
I got a degree in political science. I really enjoy what other people have to say! I have been reported as well and I can say that my question was not harmful to anyone!
I like people to keep an open mind about questions I ask but many times as you say they just rant and rave not really having a opinion and so many of the answers are biased!
Sometimes, people who hold a particular political view ask questions not seeking information but to receive reinforcement from like minded individuals. The more certain they are that the vast majority agrees with them, the more likely they are to report people who do not agree.
Try not to take it personally. Here is a star to help you feel better.
*
Ok So I want 100 people to tell me a random fact/rant!?
Did you no that guys are at the ceter of all girls problems?
Woman has Man in it;
Mrs. has Mr. in it;
Female has Male in it;
She has He in it;
Madam has Adam in it;
Okay, Okay, it all makes sense now...
I never looked at it this way before:
Ever notice how all of women's problems start with MEN?
MEN tal illness
MEN strual cramps
MEN tal breakdown
MEN opause
GUY necologist
AND ..
When we have REAL trouble, it's a
HISterectomy..Ok So I want 100 people to tell me a random fact/rant!?
';Bookkeeper'; is the only word in the English language that has three consecutive double letters.Ok So I want 100 people to tell me a random fact/rant!?
Ok random fact:
In New York City, in the subway system, the R-32 class car is the only type with a stainless steel frame.
Rant:
I like to wear skirts and capes (I am a guy) and I hate how society is against guys that do so!!
Puerto Rico is a US colony, and it has been for a couple hundred of years.
1.Recycling a can produces enough energy to power a TV for 3 hours
2.Over 10,000 thousand birds die in a year by smashing into windows
3. My School had a fire today
typewriter is the longest word you can type using only the top row of keys
A group of jellyfish is called a ';schmuck';.
Really.... a ';guy';necologist...
Most of the world's supply of vanilla is grown in Madagascar.
Suave has a family sized lotion
wow i love your fact...seriously this really
made my day cause its funny...guys really
just pi$$ me off at times...there thats my fact
;)
Danica Patrick is the only woman that I'd let drive my car.
school was made to punish kids and teens
lol that was cute.
hmm a random fact?
Today's my birthday!
Woman has Man in it;
Mrs. has Mr. in it;
Female has Male in it;
She has He in it;
Madam has Adam in it;
Okay, Okay, it all makes sense now...
I never looked at it this way before:
Ever notice how all of women's problems start with MEN?
MEN tal illness
MEN strual cramps
MEN tal breakdown
MEN opause
GUY necologist
AND ..
When we have REAL trouble, it's a
HISterectomy..Ok So I want 100 people to tell me a random fact/rant!?
';Bookkeeper'; is the only word in the English language that has three consecutive double letters.Ok So I want 100 people to tell me a random fact/rant!?
Ok random fact:
In New York City, in the subway system, the R-32 class car is the only type with a stainless steel frame.
Rant:
I like to wear skirts and capes (I am a guy) and I hate how society is against guys that do so!!
Puerto Rico is a US colony, and it has been for a couple hundred of years.
1.Recycling a can produces enough energy to power a TV for 3 hours
2.Over 10,000 thousand birds die in a year by smashing into windows
3. My School had a fire today
typewriter is the longest word you can type using only the top row of keys
A group of jellyfish is called a ';schmuck';.
Really.... a ';guy';necologist...
Most of the world's supply of vanilla is grown in Madagascar.
Suave has a family sized lotion
wow i love your fact...seriously this really
made my day cause its funny...guys really
just pi$$ me off at times...there thats my fact
;)
Danica Patrick is the only woman that I'd let drive my car.
school was made to punish kids and teens
lol that was cute.
hmm a random fact?
Today's my birthday!
What is wrong with the radio these days (this is not a rant)...?
Okay, again... This is not a rant.
I'm wanting to know what seriously has gone wrong with the radio. I lived 20~ish years of my life listening to the radio and always finding a song I like often.
Aside from them playing the same hit songs over and over and over again... They're playing HORRIBLE hit songs.
I'm a fan of almost every type of music. I like Oprah, rap, rock, country, techno/house/dance/drum n bass, 80s, 90s, and everything before and after those years.
From The Animals to Ne-yo. I like it all.
I'm in cars a lot while at work. In and out of them, long enough to scan through hit channels (NOT talk radio), and find a song I like.
Lately I can't find music I like. It has to be a station that plays a lot of older songs (pre-08).
Rap and country primarily have gone down the drain. The songs they're coming up with are HORRIBLE. Repeating a 3 second phrase and calling it a chorus.
Rock is getting there too - a lot of it is the same style that EVERYONE else is playing and it all sounds the same.
I know for a fact I'm not the only person tired of hearing crap.
Aren't there MILLIONS of people trying to put their style of the music on the radio? Seriously? They can't find better than horrible remakes of ';love is a battle field';?
Has the number of people trying to write hit songs died off?
Or are they just trying to stick with a type of music/artists that they think will sell?
I dono, I just thought with the economy, maybe a bunch of people gave up on writing music and trying to air it... B/c they had to find a more reasonable way to make money...?
Anyone have any insights on this?What is wrong with the radio these days (this is not a rant)...?
= MONEY = One word should answer all your questions. It is not about the listener anymore. Just MONEY!!
* Have a Good Day *
~ Don ~
I'm wanting to know what seriously has gone wrong with the radio. I lived 20~ish years of my life listening to the radio and always finding a song I like often.
Aside from them playing the same hit songs over and over and over again... They're playing HORRIBLE hit songs.
I'm a fan of almost every type of music. I like Oprah, rap, rock, country, techno/house/dance/drum n bass, 80s, 90s, and everything before and after those years.
From The Animals to Ne-yo. I like it all.
I'm in cars a lot while at work. In and out of them, long enough to scan through hit channels (NOT talk radio), and find a song I like.
Lately I can't find music I like. It has to be a station that plays a lot of older songs (pre-08).
Rap and country primarily have gone down the drain. The songs they're coming up with are HORRIBLE. Repeating a 3 second phrase and calling it a chorus.
Rock is getting there too - a lot of it is the same style that EVERYONE else is playing and it all sounds the same.
I know for a fact I'm not the only person tired of hearing crap.
Aren't there MILLIONS of people trying to put their style of the music on the radio? Seriously? They can't find better than horrible remakes of ';love is a battle field';?
Has the number of people trying to write hit songs died off?
Or are they just trying to stick with a type of music/artists that they think will sell?
I dono, I just thought with the economy, maybe a bunch of people gave up on writing music and trying to air it... B/c they had to find a more reasonable way to make money...?
Anyone have any insights on this?What is wrong with the radio these days (this is not a rant)...?
= MONEY = One word should answer all your questions. It is not about the listener anymore. Just MONEY!!
* Have a Good Day *
~ Don ~
When you want to, but can't, what do you do?...I rant?
Rant On My Brother, Rant On
I've had enough of biting this tongue
Twisted two fisted port listed and going down
For the last time
With my fast rhyme
I'll beat you defeat you
cause i see through your clear view
window less shell that keeps in this hell
this reek that i smell the lies that you tell
to deflect the rays being shot
cause your not my equal
this ain't no prequel
won't be no sequel
your not my equal
and I know it
and that's all I need to know
©rad081508
I have my reasons
When you want to, but can't, what do you do?...I rant?
Loved it...am going through pure unmitigated hell trying to transport a just purchased car from next state...the above works well if I switch around a few words. Can you hear my ranting...
I have never seen more catch 22's in my entire life!When you want to, but can't, what do you do?...I rant?
Is this a rap challenge? No, just kidding, but your words do have that angry flow to them which is becoming more and more popular by musical association. Now you must don baggy clothes and voluminous gold chains and begin to talk in a voice that speaks only somewhat understandably.
I have issues with the rap genre, but not with this poem as this is not its intent. You know what you need to know, that is good, and I know what I need to know. Long may your poetry sing, long may I live to hear.
Here's my rant
Picturing you tied firmly to a bed of nails
Gnashing at the teeth and hearing useless wails
You tore out my heart as you played the lovers game
Now I laugh and howl with Satan as death calls out your name
Angry poems make great metal music lyrics. Keep it up you may be writing for the next band.
The title says it all. ';Rant On My Brother, Rant On';.
If I was a Shrink I'd prescribe reading a fun, light-hearted book such as Salinger's Catcher in the Rye. That thing is hilarious.
very good ,,, the anger is controlling her, and works well
If anger be this bite of life, rant on!
Does it cost me to use the news bubble on my samsung rant?
Well my mother gave me her samsung rant (probably because she doesnt know how to use it. poor senior) and she doesn't have internet on it but what it does have are these ';bubbles'; and when i use the news bubble im guessing it takes me to the internet because at the top it has a browser address. i've been reading online and it says to add bubbles are free, it never said anything about using them. i reeeeally dont feel like calling the sprint company to ask them this stupid question, any help?Does it cost me to use the news bubble on my samsung rant?
It is only a stupid question if you don't ask it. These questions are why Sprint maintains customer service lines.
It is only a stupid question if you don't ask it. These questions are why Sprint maintains customer service lines.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)